Now, counterclaims!

We've spent a little bit of time looking at a few articles that make argument from a couple of perspectives on our debate question. We've also established that our base-line for a strong argument is that it have:

1. A clear, arguable claim.
2. Appropriate, well-selected evidence in support of that claim.
3. Clear, fully-articulated reasoning that explains the connections between the evidence given and the claim being made.

Now, we're going to add a fourth part to our definition of a strong argument:

      4. It references and refutes counterclaims from the opposing position.

Read this article, it present two opposing sides of the argument about parental notification:
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/la-oew-gerace-short22-2008oct22-story.html#axzz30H2Kfq9N

Then, go to each of the following links and, in the comments, explain what each side presents as its
1. Claim
2. Evidence
3. Reasoning
4. Counterclaims

The argument in favor of parental notification.

The argument against parental notification.